I Tested Writely AI Writing Tool on a Raw Diet Blog Post – Here's How It Performed

I needed to draft a 1500-word SEO blog post for a client in the pet care niche. The topic was “how to transition your dog to a raw diet.” I’ve used other AI writing tools before, and they usually give me generic, repetitive text that takes as long to edit as it would to write from scratch. So I decided to try writely – the AI writing tool that promises blog-focused drafting with SEO help. I wanted to see if it could actually save time without making me sound like a robot.

Starting with a concrete use scenario: the raw diet blog post

I opened Writely and selected the “Blog Post” template. The first step was entering the working title and a few bullet points about what I wanted to cover – things like gradual transition, portion sizes, and common mistakes. Writely generated a full outline in about 15 seconds. The outline was surprisingly solid: it had eight main sections that matched the logical flow I had in mind, plus a suggested introduction and conclusion.

What I noticed immediately: the outline wasn’t just a generic list of headings. It included brief notes under each section, like “mention the 80/10/10 ratio” or “add a warning about bone content.” That level of specificity helped me decide to keep the outline as-is, which is rare for me – I usually heavily tweak AI-generated outlines. But here I only reordered two sections.

Drafting section by section: tone control and actual writing speed

Once the outline was set, I wrote each section one by one. You can set the tone (professional, friendly, persuasive, etc.) and the complexity. I chose “friendly but informative” and let Writely generate a 200-word draft for the first section about “why gradual transition is important.” The output read naturally – it wasn’t stuffed with SEO keywords or fluff. It used a short anecdote about a dog having digestive upset when switched too fast, which I kept because it added credibility.

I did find that the “professional” tone setting was a bit too stiff for a pet blog. For example, it used “canine” instead of “dog” throughout. That’s an easy fix, but if you’re writing for a casual audience, stick with the “friendly” or “conversational” options. The tool remembers your choice for each section, so I didn’t have to re-select it every time.

Writing speed was genuinely faster than typing from scratch. I completed the first 800 words in about 20 minutes, including minor edits. That’s about twice as fast as my normal pace when I have to research and compose simultaneously. The AI writing tool also suggested internal linking phrases naturally – it didn’t force them.

SEO features: the built-in grading was useful but not magical

After finishing the draft, I opened the SEO panel. Writely scans your text for keyword density, readability, and structure. It flagged two places where my primary keyword “raw diet transition” appeared too close together, and it suggested adding a subheading for “potential risks” (which I had missed). I appreciate that it doesn’t try to cram keywords – just points out where things can improve.

I also tested the ai seo content generator free version (Writely has a limited free tier) to see if the same SEO analysis existed. It does, but you only get a few articles per month on the free plan. For a one-time project, that might be enough. If you’re researching the best ai writing assistant 2026, you should know that the free tier won’t let you do heavy-volume work, but the quality on the paid plan is noticeably better because you can tweak the output length and tone with more control.

One tradeoff: the SEO suggestions are generic. They don’t connect to Google Search Console data or real SERP analysis. You still need your own keyword research. That’s fine for a first pass, but it’s not a replacement for a dedicated SEO tool.

Where I hit friction – limitations that felt real

First, the editor itself. The interface is clean, but with longer documents (over 1,200 words) the response to typing slowed down noticeably. Scrolling was fine, but real-time grammar checks lagged. Not a dealbreaker, but noticeable.

Second, the brand voice. Writely allows custom voice prompts (describe your brand tone in a sentence), but once you apply it, the generated text can feel inconsistent. For example, in one section it used contractions (“don’t”, “can’t”), and in the next it reverted to formal phrasing (“do not”, “cannot”). I had to manually copy the voice prompt into each new article session because it doesn’t save across projects in the free plan. That’s a mild annoyance, but worth knowing if you maintain multiple blogs.

Third, the “expand” feature. I tried to expand a weak paragraph about raw food brands. The tool inserted generic info like “there are many brands available” without specifics. I ended up deleting it and writing a short list myself. The expand function works best when the existing text already contains a specific fact or statistic – otherwise it just pads.

Is this the best AI writing tool for your workflow?

I wouldn’t call Writely the best ai writing assistant 2026 for everyone. If you need highly creative marketing copy with emotional storytelling, it’s probably not there yet. But if you regularly draft structured blog posts that require SEO basics and a clear outline, it’s one of the more focused tools I’ve used. It doesn’t try to do everything – no social media captions, no email sequences – it stays in the blog/SCO lane.

For someone looking for a free ai content writer 2026 trial, the free plan gives you enough runs to evaluate whether the outline generation and tone control fit your style. Just don’t expect the full SEO suite without upgrading.

Would I use it again? Yes, for first drafts and outlines. But I’ll still edit every paragraph – especially the expand feature output. It feels like a solid assistant, not a ghostwriter. And that’s probably the honest place for any AI writing tool right now.